Carlson v. Locatelli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the court could hear the appeal “[s]ince an order granting or refusing a new trial is appealable” by statute
• providing that orders granting a mistrial are typically not appealable because they are not final orders
• “ ‘[ojrders granting a mistrial ... are not final’ and ... not appealable.” (quoting 15B Charles A. Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Edward H. Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 3915.1 (1992)); Hairlox Co., Inc. v. McDonald, 557 A.2d 163, 164 (D.C.App.1989
• \`[o]rders granting a mistrial ... are not final' and ... not appealable.\ ( quoting 15B Charles A. Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Edward H. Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure, § 3915.1 (1992)); Hairlox Co., Inc. v. McDonald, 557 A.2d 163, 164 (D.C.App.1989

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).