· 11/24/2010
Wyeth v. Rowatt
Citations
- 244 P.3d 765
- 126 Nev. 446
- 126 Nev. Adv. Rep. 44
- 2010 Nev. LEXIS 48
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that an order granting or denying judgment as a matter of law is reviewed de novo
- holding such error is reversible where the result may have been different but for the error
- holding such error is reversible where the result may have been different but for the error
- stating that the denial of a motion for new trial is reviewed for abuse of discretion
- holding such error is reversible where the result may have been different but for the error
- holding such error is reversible where the result may have been different but for the error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cherry, Parraguirre, Hardesty, Douglas, Saitta, Gibbons
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.