Skip to main content
· 11/24/2010

Wyeth v. Rowatt

Citations

  • 244 P.3d 765
  • 126 Nev. 446
  • 126 Nev. Adv. Rep. 44
  • 2010 Nev. LEXIS 48

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an order granting or denying judgment as a matter of law is reviewed de novo
  • holding such error is reversible where the result may have been different but for the error
  • holding such error is reversible where the result may have been different but for the error
  • stating that the denial of a motion for new trial is reviewed for abuse of discretion
  • holding such error is reversible where the result may have been different but for the error
  • holding such error is reversible where the result may have been different but for the error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cherry, Parraguirre, Hardesty, Douglas, Saitta, Gibbons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.