Skip to main content

Eastern Shore Title Co. v. Ochse

Citations

  • 160 A.3d 1238
  • 453 Md. 303
  • 2017 WL 2361793
  • 2017 Md. LEXIS 388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the “litigation did not involve a fee-shifting statute, and therefore the lodestar method of calculation would not be appropriate”
  • stating that the “litigation did not involve a fee-shifting statute, and therefore the lodestar method of calculation would not be appropriate”
  • stating that the “litigation did not involve a fee-shifting statute, and therefore the lodestar method of calculation would not be appropriate”
  • discussing application of collateral source rule and exceptions to the rule
  • “economic damages” as “[c]ompensatory damages that will not be awarded without proof of pecuniary loss”
  • negligent title company was responsible for attorney fees incurred by the plaintiffs in separate litigation with a third-party property owner to resolve a title dispute that resulted from the title company’s negligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barbera, Greene, Adkins, McDonald, Watts, Getty, Battaglia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Eastern Shore Title Co. v. Ochse

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.