Charles W. Travelstead, Claimant-Appellee v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary, of Veterans Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when “the court rendered a ‘decision’ interpreting a statute ... and compelling action of the. Secretary, on remand, ... [t]his ‘decision’. was a final disposition of the proceeding,” and was appealable
• holding that this court had appellate jurisdiction over a remand to the Department of Veterans Affairs where the lower court’s remand order required the agency to act contrary to its interpretation of 38 U.S.C. § 3713
• holding that when “the court rendered a ‘decision’ interpreting a statute . . . and compelling action of the Secretary, on remand, . . . [t]his ‘decision’ was a final disposition of the proceeding,” and was appealable
• holding that when “the court rendered a ‘decision’ interpreting a statute . . . and compelling action of the Secretary, on remand, . . . [t]his ‘decision’ was a final disposition of the proceeding,” and was appealable
• explaining that “remands are not all of the same nature” and noting that “[s]ome are final; some are not”
• explaining that “remands are not all of the same nature” and noting that “[s]ome are final; some are not”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).