District of Columbia· 5/12/2017
Easaw v. Newport
Citations
- 253 F. Supp. 3d 22
- 2017 WL 2062851
- 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72546
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “At the motion to dismiss stage, . . . an employment discrimination plaintiff need not anticipate legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons that may be proffered by the employer for the adverse employment action nor allege pretext to survive a motion to dismiss.”
- collecting cases that recognize tortious interference for at-will employment contracts
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Tommy Ho v. Merrick GarlandD.C. Circuit· 2024-07-02· cited 69×
- Breen v. MinetaDistrict of Columbia· 2017-05-26· cited 18×
- Libre by Nexus v. Buzzfeed, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2018-05-16· cited 15×
- Williams v. Dist. of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2018-06-30· cited 7×
- Saiyed v. Council on Am.-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2018-09-28· cited 2×
- Libre by Nexus v. Buzzfeed, Inc.District of Columbia· 2018-05-16
- Fairbanks v. RollerDistrict of Columbia· 2018-06-06
- Williams v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police DepartmentDistrict of Columbia· 2018-06-30
- Saiyed v. Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc.District of Columbia· 2018-09-28
- Lopez v. Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc.District of Columbia· 2018-09-28
- Easaw v. NewportDistrict of Columbia· 2018-10-15
- Fridman v. Bean LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2019-01-15
- Redmon v. Ymca of Metropolitan WashingtonDistrict of Columbia· 2019-10-24
- Arpaio v. ZuckerDistrict of Columbia· 2019-10-31
- Mosleh v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia· 2020-02-27
- Everson v. Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, Inc.District of Columbia· 2020-10-16
- Attias v. Carefirst, Inc.District of Columbia· 2021-01-29
- Mulkerin v. Smithsonian InstitutionDistrict of Columbia· 2021-08-25
- Squires v. Gallaudet UniversityDistrict of Columbia· 2021-09-27
- Mitchell v. BarrDistrict of Columbia· 2022-03-09
Cites
110 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 15,585×
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 12,455×
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 6,226×
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 4,775×
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court· 1965-04-26· cited 2,853×
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court· 1991-03-20· cited 2,415×
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1994-03-01· cited 1,980×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchD.C. Circuit· 1997-07-18· cited 1,499×
- Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court· 1989-03-08· cited 1,465×
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsD.C. Circuit· 2008-03-28· cited 1,336×
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncD.C. Circuit· 2000-06-27· cited 1,335×
- Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court· 2011-03-01· cited 1,083×
- Truax v. RaichSupreme Court· 1915-11-01· cited 1,066×
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court· 1980-06-02· cited 848×
Other cases named Easaw v. Newport
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.