Skip to main content

Dupree v. State

Citations

  • 615 So. 2d 713
  • 1993 WL 2968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that evidence was sufficient for the jury to infer premeditation where the victim had been beaten prior to being strangled and scuffs marks on the ground at the scene of the killing suggested that a struggle had taken place
  • holding “that the trial court properly excluded the proffered character evidence, because the defendant did not show how the victim’s character was pertinent, that is, he did not rely on the defense of self-defense or raise an issue concerning who was the initial aggressor”
  • evidence of beating and strangulation sufficient to support premeditation because the strangulation gives the defendant time to “reflect upon his actions”
  • defendant strangled a woman with whom he had been socializing the day before her body was found
  • “[W]e have found no Florida case in which aggressive character evidence was allowed without evidence as well of self-defense or doubt regarding who was the first aggressor.”
  • “[W]e have found no Florida case in which aggressive character evidence was allowed without evidence as well of self-defense or doubt regarding who was the first aggressor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.