Criner v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Defendant’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel were not cognizable on direct appeal, where such claims were not apparent on the face of the record
• “A judgment of acquittal should only be granted when the jury cannot reasonably view the evidence in any manner favorable to the opposing party.”
• “A judgment of acquittal should only be granted when the jury cannot reasonably view the evidence in any manner favorable to the opposing party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Burns v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-02-28· cited 9×
• Criner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-03-16· cited 6×
• Fowler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-30· cited 5×
• Celeste Chambers v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-10-04· cited 4×
• Zanterrial Dejohn Carter v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-11-29· cited 3×
• Kelly v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-03-04

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lynch v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-03-13· cited 390×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-03· cited 87×
• Dupree v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-11· cited 23×
• Grant v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-17· cited 3×