Douglas v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• error not harmless where trial court limited cross-examination of informant who was essential element of trial
• “When charges are pending against a prosecution witness at the time he testifies, the defense is entitled to present this fact to the jury to show bias, motive or self-interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Melgares v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-28· cited 7×
• Cortes v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-03-06· cited 4×
• Dingle v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-10-01· cited 2×
• George v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-07-05· cited 1×
• Guidry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-04-13

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Fulton v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-07-08· cited 99×
• Breedlove v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-05-09· cited 56×
• Morrell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-06-27· cited 40×
• Dupree v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-01-11· cited 23×
• Auchmuty v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-04· cited 19×
• Powe v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-05-14· cited 16×
• Bell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-02-10· cited 7×
• DeAngelis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-09-30· cited 4×
• Love v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-10· cited 4×