Skip to main content

Dunlap v. State

Citations

  • 728 S.W.2d 155
  • 292 Ark. 51
  • 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2055

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where the jury is instructed by the trial court that counsel’s arguments during closing arguments were not evidence, the jury is presumed to have followed the instruction
  • obscene material \attempts to activate prurient interests [and] whether or not the material is successful in doing so is beside the point\
  • obscene material “attempts to activate prurient interests [and] whether or not the material is successful in doing so is beside the point”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dudley, Purtle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.