Skip to main content

Dunlap v. State

Citations

  • 559 P.2d 788
  • 221 Kan. 268
  • 1977 Kan. LEXIS 210

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \The time consumed and wasted by piecemeal litigation impedes the dispatch of business in the courts.\
  • \Unless exceptional circumstances are shown the sentencing court may properly dismiss a second or successive motion . . . on the ground its use constitutes an abuse of remedy.\
  • \The sentencing court should not entertain a second or successive motion for relief under K.S.A. 60-1507 on behalf of the same person unless the errors affect constitutional rights and there are exceptional circumstances which justify entertaining a second or successive motion.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fromme

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.