Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 9 So. 3d 514
  • 2006 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 179
  • 2006 WL 510508

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Rule 32 procedural bar sua sponte and stating that “this Court has no authority to modify or amend the procedural bars contained in Rule 32”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baschab, Cobb, McMILLAN, Shaw, Wise

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

113 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.