Skip to main content

Duncan v. Duncan

Citations

  • 672 S.W.2d 765
  • 1984 Tenn. LEXIS 815

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Tenn. R.App. P. 14 cannot be used to relitigate an issue at the appellate level based on facts occurring after the entry of the judgment
  • cautioning appellate courts not to use Rule 14 to renew factual issues from the trial
  • cautioning appellate courts not to use Rule 14 to renew factual issues from the trial
  • denying consideration of “pleadings and other matters concerning a subsequent suit between the same parties” and ruling that when “the pleadings of another case are irrelevant to the case on appeal, a Rule 14 motion is appropriately denied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brock, Cooper, Fones, Harbison, Drowota

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.