Skip to main content
· 5/20/2011

Baugh v. Novak

Citations

  • 340 S.W.3d 372
  • 2011 Tenn. LEXIS 453
  • 2011 WL 1935839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, “[a]s a general matter, the issues addressed by the appellate courts should be limited to those that have been raised and litigated in the lower courts”
  • “A statute may still provide the basis for finding a contract unenforceable even if it does not specifically invalidate the contract or deprive the contracting parties of their right to pursue remedies if the contract is breached.”
  • “The authority ‘of the courts to invalidate the bargains of parties on grounds of public policy is unquestioned and is clearly necessary.’” (quoting 5 Samuel Williston, Treatise on the Law of Contracts § 12:3, at 858 (Richard A. Lord ed., 4th ed. 2009)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koch, Clark, Holder, Wade, Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.