Skip to main content

Duncan v. Duncan

Citations

  • 789 S.W.2d 557
  • 1990 Tenn. App. LEXIS 46
  • 1990 WL 65726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that Rule 60.02 relief pursuant to the catch-all provision is “applicable to situations that are not covered by the other clauses in [Rule 60.02] or to cases of extreme hardship”
  • denying wife’s motion for relief from judgment under “catch-all” provision of T.R.C.P. 60.02(5
  • “relief [is provided] only in the most unique, exceptional, or extraordinary circumstances.”
  • “relief [is provided] only in the most unique, exceptional, or extraordinary circumstances.”
  • applying Rule 36 to the denial of requested discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koch, Todd, Kilcrease

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.