District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/13/1983
Dumas v. State
Citations
- 439 So. 2d 246
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the information was stamped “‘waived trial by jury with consent of state,’ above which [was] the signature of the defendant”
- “Because the right of an accused to trial by jury is fundamental, Floyd v. State, 90 So. 2d 105, 106 (Fla. 1956), an infringement of that right constitutes fundamental error.”
- “Because the right of an accused to trial by jury is fundamental, Floyd v. State, 90 So. 2d 105, 106 (Fla. 1956), an infringement of that right constitutes fundamental error.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwartz, C.J., and Hendry, Barkdull, Hubbart, Nesbitt, Baskin, Daniel S. Pearson, Ferguson and Jorgenson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. DaughtryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-25· cited 56×
- Blair v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1997-08-28· cited 33×
- State v. UptonSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-07-20· cited 33×
- Nova v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-09-13· cited 24×
- Thompson v. CrawfordDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-11-20· cited 19×
- Dumas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1985-01-31· cited 14×
- Anthony Paul Peoples, Jr. v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-07-09· cited 11×
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-08-03· cited 9×
- Parker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-03· cited 9×
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-09-08· cited 7×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-03-28· cited 7×
- Flanning v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-07· cited 5×
- Zinnerman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-07-02· cited 4×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-09-28· cited 4×
- Tucker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-08-02· cited 4×
- Kemp v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-04-18· cited 3×
- Upton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-28· cited 3×
- Hall v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-12-10· cited 2×
- Westberry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-02-14· cited 1×
- Pino v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-08-12· cited 1×
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 3,675×
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,897×
- Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 1,618×
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 1,382×
- Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1930-04-14· cited 1,162×
- Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-07-28· cited 315×
- United States v. Thomas C. TobiasFifth Circuit· 1981-11-30· cited 145×
- Ciummei v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-07-25· cited 115×
- McCrae v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1981-04-09· cited 101×
- Laney v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1982-06-07· cited 94×
- State v. IrvingSupreme Court of Kansas· 1975-04-05· cited 89×
- State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Florida· 1969-12-10· cited 87×
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-11-08· cited 86×
- Countess v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-12-10· cited 81×
- United States v. Reginald E. DavidD.C. Circuit· 1975-10-25· cited 80×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.