Skip to main content

State v. Upton

Citations

  • 658 So. 2d 86
  • 1995 WL 424175

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court must ensure any waiver of the right to jury trial is made “knowingly, voluntarily[,] and intelligently”
  • concluding that, because ‘‘there was no affirmative showing on the record’’ that defendant personally waived his right to jury trial, state could not prove waiver was knowingly, intelligently and volunta- rily made
  • approving of a district court decision that reversed a defendant's conviction and sentence where the defendant's attorney, alone, waived a jury trial
  • “When the record contains a written waiver signed by the defendant, the waiver will be upheld.”
  • “An effective waiver of a constitutional right must be knowing, voluntary, and intelligent” (citing Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970))
  • \The mere fact that Upton remained silent during the trial and did not object to the judge sitting as the fact-finder was insufficient to demonstrate that he agreed with the waiver.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grimes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.