Skip to main content
· 3/9/1995

Raymond Trimble v. City of Santa Rosa

Citations

  • 49 F.3d 583
  • 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1825
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 4592
  • 1995 WL 94674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming summary judgment and dismissal without prejudice of § 1983 claims that should have been brought through habeas
  • affirming 2 dismissal of § 1983 claim predicated on ineffective assistance of counsel; holding claim 3 necessarily implicated invalidity of conviction and thus was barred by Heck
  • explaining that ineffective assistance of counsel claims are Heck-barred
  • finding a claim alleging that an officer failed to read Miranda warnings was Heck-barred
  • when a complaint includes claims that could properly be the subject of a habeas petition, such claims must be dismissed without prejudice
  • a civil rights complaint seeking habeas relief should be dismissed without prejudice to filing 13 as a petition for writ of habeas corpus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schroeder, Canby, Leavy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.