Skip to main content

Downey v. State

Citations

  • 726 N.E.2d 794
  • 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 437
  • 2000 WL 337513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony of child complainant that the defendant \rubbed his penis between her buttocks until orgasm\ was insufficient to prove contact between the defendant's penis and the complainant’s anus
  • holding that testimony of child complainant that the defendant “rubbed his penis between her buttocks until orgasm” was insufficient to prove contact between the defendant’s penis and the complainant’s anus
  • finding insufficient evidence of contact with victim’s anus, as opposed to buttocks, when defendant “put his penis between her cheeks of her bottom ... and started ... humping her”
  • where a defendant was charged with Class A felony child molesting based on “deviate sexual conduct” (now “other sexual conduct”
  • “Despite their proximity, the buttocks and anus are not the same, and an. inference that contact with the buttocks-necessarily includes contact with the anus[ 7 ] cannot be made beyond a reasonable doubt in this case.”
  • “Despite their proximity, the buttocks and anus are not the same, and an inference that contact with the buttocks necessarily includes contact with the anus[7] cannot be made beyond a reasonable doubt in this case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mattingly, Kirsch, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.