Wisneskey v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• uncorroborated testimony of child victim is sufficient to support a conviction of child molesting
• “T.L.’s testimony that it hurt when Wisneskey stuck his penis in his ‘butt,’ can reasonably lead to the inference that the pain was the result of the child being sodomized.”
• uncorroborated testimony of child victim is sufficient to support a conviction of child molesting
• “other sexual conduct” was formerly “deviate sexual conduct,” but the definition remains the same

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).