Knowlton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging in dicta that the act of fellatio did not require penetration and could be accomplished by a touching
• acknowledging in dicta that the act of fellatio did not require penetration and could be accomplished by a touching

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Downey v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-03-31· cited 26×
• Crabtree v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1989-12-07· cited 17×
• Steadman v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1979-02-26· cited 3×
• In re: J.D.
  Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 2019-08-20
• M A v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2024-08-09

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Baker v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1956-12-13· cited 202×
• Bruce v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1978-04-19· cited 200×
• Manlove v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1968-01-16· cited 112×
• McAfee v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1973-01-19· cited 99×
• Ruetz v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1978-03-09· cited 96×
• Henderson v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1976-03-24· cited 93×
• Pruett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-11-25· cited 65×
• Miller v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1971-04-15· cited 59×
• Critchlow v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1976-05-10· cited 41×
• Estes v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1964-01-23· cited 32×
• Dixon v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1971-04-06· cited 30×
• Shutt v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1977-10-21· cited 22×
• Finger v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1973-03-07· cited 20×
• Mitchell v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1977-08-25· cited 12×
• Glover v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1973-09-13· cited 12×