Skip to main content
· 11/22/1996

Reeves v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.

Citations

  • 926 P.2d 1130
  • 41 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1720
  • 1996 Alas. LEXIS 139
  • 1996 WL 674306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that it “prefer[red] the California approach” dispensing with novelty and that “[i]f parties voluntarily choose to bargain for an individual’s services in disclosing or developing a non-novel or unoriginal idea, they have the power to do so.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rabinowitz, Matthews and Compton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.