District of Columbia· 1/19/2016

Dougherty v. United States

Citations

156 F. Supp. 3d 222
2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6119
2016 WL 225681

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “federal employees are not subject to suit in the District of Columbia based merely on the fact that their employing agency is headquartered in this jurisdiction or maintains offices here”
“It is well established that the pleadings of pro se parties are to be ‘liberally construed.’” (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)
“It is well established that the pleadings of pro se parties are to be ‘liberally construed.’” (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)
no cause of action exists to permit district court to issue injunctive relief vacating judgment by Third Circuit
“It is well established that the pleadings of pro se parties are to be ‘liberally construed’[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

60 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Dougherty v. United States

19 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.