Dougan v. Gustaveson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that respondent’s objection to untimely service under NRCP 4(i) was itself untimely because respondent failed to object in its first responsive pleading or pre-pleading motion
• recognizing that, in certain circumstances, it may be \fruitless\ to hold a case conference simply for the purpose of complying with NRCP 16.1's deadlines
• recognizing this court's commitment to the proposition that \justice delayed is justice denied\
• “The interpretation of a federal counterpart to a Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure is not controlling, but may be persuasive.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).