George Kersh v. Norman Derozier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that pro se plaintiff’s ignorance of service procedures does not constitute good cause for failing to perfect service within permitted time
• finding that a plaintiff’s pro se status and ignorance of the law does not constitute good cause for failure to effect service in compliance with the rules
• finding that a plaintiff's pro se status and ignorance of the law does not constitute good cause for failure to effect service in compliance with the rules
• finding that a plaintiff’s pro se status and ignorance of the law does not constitute good cause for failure to effect service in compliance with the rules
• noting that pro se plaintiff’s ignorance of the law does 1 The District Judge referred this case to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B
• “The burden of es- tablishing excusable neglect is upon the appellant, even one proceeding pro se.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).