Skip to main content
· 3/24/1993

Lacey v. Wen-Neva, Inc.

Citations

  • 849 P.2d 260
  • 109 Nev. 341
  • 1993 Nev. LEXIS 58

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the filing of an amended complaint which does not name a new defendant does not automatically extend the time for service under the Nevada Rules of Civil Procedure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.