Doubleclick Inc. v. Paikin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing court has authority to modify agreement to cure any unreasonable provision as to duration or scope
• requiring parties to submit statement recommending amount and terms of security required by Rule 65(c)
• requiring parties to submit statement recommending amount and terms of security required by Rule 65(c)
• balance of harms favored plaintiff, even though the effect of an injunction would render defendant “unable to work in her chosen field”
• balance of harms favored plaintiff, even though the effect of an injunction would render defendant “unable to work in her chosen field”
• “In order to fall under this exception, DoubleClick must show that it possesses trade secrets that are worth protecting, and that Paikin had access to these secrets.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).