Skip to main content

Dorsey v. State

Citations

  • 402 So. 2d 1178

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the law \is well settled that such 'prefatory language' cannot expand or restrict the otherwise unambiguous language of a statute\
  • interpreting the definition of wire communication to apply “only to so much of the communication as is actually transmitted by wire and not broadcast in a manner available to the public”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Overton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.