Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Thomas
Citations
- 132 U.S. 174
- 10 S. Ct. 68
- 33 L. Ed. 302
- 1889 U.S. LEXIS 1858
Syllabus
<p>This court has jurisdiction to review, on writ of error, a decision of the highest court of a State, in which it is decided that a provision in a tax act of the State that it shall not apply to railroad corporations exempted from taxation by their charters is not applicable to a particular corporation, party to the suit, although its charter contains a provision respecting exemption from taxation.</p> <p>Exemptions from taxation, being in derogation of the sovereign authority and of common right, are not to be extended beyond the express requirements of the language used, when most rigidly construed.</p> <p>The appellant’s charter provided that it should “ be exempt from taxation for a term of twenty years from the completion of said railroad to the Mississippi River, but not to extend beyond twenty-five years from the date of the approval of this act: ” Held, that the exemption was intended to commence from and after the completion of a railroad to the Mississippi River', and was to continue thereafter for twenty years if the road was completed to the river in five years from the date of the approval of the act, but liable to be diminished by whatever time beyond five year’s was consumed by the completion of the road to the river.</p> <p>The preamble to a statute is no part of it, and cannot enlarge or confer powers, or control the words of the act unless they are doubtful or ambiguous.</p> <p>Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railway Co. v. Dennis, 116 U. S. 665, approved and applied.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “the preamble cannot enlarge or confer powers, nor control the word of the act, unless they are doubtful or ambiguous”
- explaining that prefatory clauses or preambles cannot change the scope of the operative clause
- stating that a “preamble is no part of the act, and cannot enlarge or confer powers, nor control the words of the act, unless they are doubtful or ambiguous”
- “... the preamble is no part of the act, and cannot enlarge or confer powers, nor control the words of the act____”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fuller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.