Reckis v. Johnson & Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming verdict for parents on loss of consortium claim in part because parents testified to \distress caused by the [child's] pain\
• “Wyeth did not define ‘clear evidence’ . . . ” (some internal quotation marks omitted)
• defendants waived claim where they \never challenged the absence or insufficiency of such evidence through a motion for a directed verdict on this ground\
• \ Wyeth did not define 'clear evidence' ... \ (some internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[T]he FDA’s explicit rejection of the 2005 citizen petition’s proposed inclusion ... provides the necessary ‘clear evidence’ that the FDA would have rejected the addition of [that same inclusion].... ”
• FDA's rejection of citizen's petition proposing specific mention of two medical conditions on label because most consumers were unfamiliar with the conditions constituted clear evidence it would have rejected proposed labeling change adding names of conditions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).