Dorch v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]t is clear that the Legislature intended that ‘union’ mean something other than penetration. We agree with the trial court that contact alone, between the sexual organ of the offender and the mouth, anus, or vagina of the victim, is sufficient to convict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Harris
  Eleventh Circuit· 2010-06-16· cited 44×
• Richards v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-02· cited 24×
• Wright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-10· cited 23×
• Stone v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-26· cited 21×
• Firkey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-14· cited 20×
• State v. Pate
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-02· cited 12×
• Wallis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-09-07· cited 12×
• Grunzel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-03-06· cited 12×
• Bowden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-22· cited 10×
• Victor v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-09-05· cited 9×
• Dickinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-04· cited 7×
• Tirado v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-03· cited 5×
• United States v. Donald Ray Harris
  Eleventh Circuit· 2010-06-16

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Campbell v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1975-01-08· cited 4×