Victor v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[a] sexual battery under chapter 794 does not require penetration of a victim. Contact between the defendant’s mouth and the victim’s sexual organ is sufficient.”
• describing the purpose of section 794.05(1), Florida Statutes, as \protecting minors from sex acts imposed by adults\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• B.B. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-06-29· cited 38×
• J.A.S. v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-02-05· cited 23×
• People v. T.A.J.
  California Court of Appeal· 1998-04-09· cited 11×
• Feliciano v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-20· cited 9×
• State v. Cunningham
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-26· cited 6×
• Tirado v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-05-03· cited 5×
• BB v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-06-29· cited 1×
• JAS v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-02-05
• In Re TAJ
  California Court of Appeal· 1998-04-09

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Banks v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1976-11-12· cited 28×
• Coleman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-03-03· cited 26×
• Stone v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-26· cited 21×
• Dorch v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-18· cited 13×
• Washington v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-09-11· cited 13×
• Brinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-05-17· cited 10×
• Griffin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-11-28· cited 3×