State v. Pate

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that pursuant to the definition of sexual battery in section 794.011(l)(h
• state not required to prove penetration to establish sexual battery; oral union with sexual organs is sufficient

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Richards v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-02· cited 24×
• Wright v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-10· cited 23×
• United States v. Raul Dagoberto Contreras
  Eleventh Circuit· 2014-01-02· cited 13×
• KEELEY
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 2017-07-01· cited 7×
• Palumbo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-01-28· cited 5×
• Rager v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-11-06· cited 4×
• Purvis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-03-16· cited 2×
• CANALES-ORDONEZ v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-02
• M.A.P. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-02-26

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stone v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-05-26· cited 21×
• Firkey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-14· cited 20×
• State v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-07-01· cited 14×
• Dorch v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-10-18· cited 13×
• Heuss v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-08-23· cited 13×
• State v. Rider
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-04-17· cited 11×
• Bowden v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-08-22· cited 10×
• Furlow v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-08-10· cited 9×
• Pineiro v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-03-16· cited 5×
• Hodak v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-02-01· cited 3×