Dorado v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in designating the outcry witness where the record failed to show that the complainant detailed the alleged offense to another person who appellant claimed was the “outcry” witness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dorado v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-12-09· cited 86×
• Hayden v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 1996-07-18· cited 62×
• Reed v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1998-06-24· cited 53×
• Schuster v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-05-05· cited 49×
• In re Z.L.B.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-08-29· cited 5×
• Dorado v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-07-07· cited 2×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Garcia v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-06-20· cited 563×
• Long v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-11-21· cited 291×
• Cockrum v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-09-14· cited 163×