Skip to main content
· 6/19/2008

Donnellan v. First Student, Inc.

Citations

  • 891 N.E.2d 463
  • 383 Ill. App. 3d 1040
  • 322 Ill. Dec. 448
  • 2008 Ill. App. LEXIS 604

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that an “award for noneconomic damages *** still must be a product of the evidence”
  • noting that as day-in-the-life videos are demonstrative and intended “to illustrate evidence regarding a party’s life at the time of trial,” disclosure just before trial “was not prejudicial”
  • upholding an award of $6 million for a plaintiff who suffered a brain injury, lost mobility, increased pain, and depression
  • upholding an award of $6 million for a plaintiff who suffered a brain injury, lost mobility, increased pain, and depression
  • “We review a trial court’s admission of a day-in-the-life video for an abuse of discretion, which occurs only when no reasonable person would agree with the decision of the trial court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.