Skip to main content

People v. Safford

Citations

  • 910 N.E.2d 143
  • 392 Ill. App. 3d 212
  • 331 Ill. Dec. 70
  • 2009 Ill. App. LEXIS 324

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that admission of the fingerprint evidence was not harmless
  • “witnesses have little chance of being found credible when [forensic] evidence points to the defendant being present at the scene of the crime”
  • latent print examiner’s testimony should not have been admitted where he failed to sufficiently explain how he found “a match”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garcia, Wolfson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Safford

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.