Mekertichian v. Mercedes-Benz U.S.A., L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the failure to adhere to this principle would “inject chaos into the judicial process”
• noting that “implied warranties give a buyer of goods a potential cause of action only against his immediate seller” (citations omitted)
• noting that the failure to adhere to this principle would “inject chaos into the judicial process”
• “[T]he UCC article II implied warranties give a buyer of goods a potential cause of action only against his immediate seller.” (citation omitted)
• “After our supreme court has declared the law with respect to an issue, this court must follow that law, as only the supreme court has authority to overrule or modify its own decisions”
• “As an inferior court of review, our serving as a reviewing court on our supreme court’s interpretation of federal law would inject chaos into the judicial process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).