Skip to main content
· 1/18/1990

Dole v. Amerilink Corp.

Citations

  • 729 F. Supp. 73
  • 1990 WL 3567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that because the installers had a self-determined opportunity for profit or loss, this factor indicates “contractor” status
  • finding that costs of tools, vehicle, and insurance constitute a significant investment and contrast sharply with the experience of a typical clerical employee, who finds all of his office supplies waiting for him at his work-station, freely provided by the employer
  • discussing the “control” the putative employer had over the installers and concluding that it was insufficient to make them employees
  • “[T]his [quality control] constraint inheres in any subcontractor relationship and the Court does not find this isolated instance of control dis-positive”
  • installers possess special skills of carpenters and electricians, which is indicative of contractor status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gunn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.