· 1/18/1990
Dole v. Amerilink Corp.
Citations
- 729 F. Supp. 73
- 1990 WL 3567
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that because the installers had a self-determined opportunity for profit or loss, this factor indicates “contractor” status
- finding that costs of tools, vehicle, and insurance constitute a significant investment and contrast sharply with the experience of a typical clerical employee, who finds all of his office supplies waiting for him at his work-station, freely provided by the employer
- discussing the “control” the putative employer had over the installers and concluding that it was insufficient to make them employees
- “[T]his [quality control] constraint inheres in any subcontractor relationship and the Court does not find this isolated instance of control dis-positive”
- installers possess special skills of carpenters and electricians, which is indicative of contractor status
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gunn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.