United States v. Rosenwasser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that FLSA’s definition of employee has been called the “ ‘broadest definition that has ever been included in any one act’”
• holding workers to be covered even if their employer chose to pay them by piece-rate rather than hourly wage
• holding workers to be covered even if their employer chose to pay them by piece-rate rather than hourly wage
• holding that “Section 7(a) [of the FLSA] refers to a ‘regular rate’ which we have defined to mean ‘the hourly rate actually paid for the normal, non-overtime workweek.’ ” (quoting Helmerich & Payne, Inc., 323 U.S. at 40)
• holding that “Section 7(a) [of the FLSA] refers to a ‘regular rate’ which we have defined to mean ‘the hourly rate actually paid for the normal, non-overtime workweek.’ ” (quoting Helmerich & Payne, Inc., 323 U.S. at 40, 65 S.Ct. 11)
• holding that “Section 7(a) [of the FLSA] refers to a ‘regular rate’ which we have defined to mean ‘the hourly rate actually paid for the normal, non-overtime workweek.’ ” (quoting Helmerich & Payne, Inc., 323 U.S. at 40, 65 S.Ct. 11)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).