Doe v. Roe
Citations
- 247 N.E.3d 1143
- 2024 Ohio 2716
Syllabus
pseudonym final appealable order Civ.R. 10(A) abuse of discretion. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by ultimately denying plaintiff's motion to proceed under pseudonym status because plaintiff's privacy interests do not substantially outweigh the presumption of open judicial proceedings. Applying the factors established by Ohio courts, we find that this is not an exceptional circumstance requiring the use of pseudonyms.
Judges: Groves
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- John Doe v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wisconsin and Aurora Health Care, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 1997-04-29· cited 436×
- B v. FrancisEleventh Circuit· 2011-02-01· cited 116×
- Doe v. PorterSixth Circuit· 2004-06-07· cited 21×
- Doe v. Cuyahoga Cty. Community CollegeOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-24· cited 18×
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Shanahan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-02-17· cited 9×
- Lewicki v. Grange Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-14· cited 8×
- Stratton v. StrattonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-15· cited 7×
- Doe v. Cedarville Univ.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-12· cited 1×
- Trunk v. ColemanOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-02-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.