Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/12/2024
Doe v. Cedarville Univ.
Citations
- 233 N.E.3d 1128
- 2024 Ohio 100
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling appellant's motion to proceed under a pseudonym where the court weighed the relevant factors and concluded that appellant had failed to show that her privacy interest substantially outweighed the presumption of open judicial proceedings. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,562×
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1985-08-09· cited 830×
- Doe v. StegallFifth Circuit· 1981-08-10· cited 298×
- National Commodity & Barter Ass'n, National Commodity Exchange v. GibbsTenth Circuit· 1989-09-25· cited 234×
- Doe v. MeglessThird Circuit· 2011-08-01· cited 182×
- B.R. v. F.C.S.B.Fourth Circuit· 2021-11-02· cited 22×
- Doe v. PorterSixth Circuit· 2004-06-07· cited 21×
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Shanahan (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-02-17· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.