Doe v. Cedarville Univ.
Citations
- 233 N.E.3d 1128
- 2024 Ohio 100
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling appellant's motion to proceed under a pseudonym where the court weighed the relevant factors and concluded that appellant had failed to show that her privacy interest substantially outweighed the presumption of open judicial proceedings. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- carrier itself did not consider a particular letter as a clear, definite and unequivocal denial of a claim
- statute of limitations did not begin to run where court characterized letter disallowing the claim as “qualified”
- carrier itself did not consider a particular letter as a clear, definite and unequivocal denial of a claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.