Second Circuit· 2/2/2001
Barna v. Travis
Citations
- 239 F.3d 169
- 2001 WL 91725
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Neither the mere possibility of release, nor a statistical probability of release, gives rise to a legitimate expectancy of release on parole.” (citations omitted)
- “Neither the mere possibility of release, nor a statistical probability of release, gives rise to a legiti mate expectancy of release on parole.” (citations omitted)
- “The Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to guidelines that do not create mandatory rules for release but are promulgated simply to guide the parole board in the exercise of its discretion.”
- “Neither the mere possibility of release, nor a statistical probability of release, gives rise to a legitimate expectancy of release on parole.” (citations omitted)
- “The Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to guidelines that do not create mandatory rules for release but are promulgated simply to guide the parole board in the exercise of its discretion.”
- “The Ex Post Facto Clause does not apply to guidelines that do not create mandatory rules for release but are promulgated simply to guide the parole board in the exercise of its discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kearse, Newman, Winter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Graziano v. PatakiSecond Circuit· 2012-08-03· cited 158×
- Carver v. LehmanNinth Circuit· 2009-03-03· cited 57×
- Barna v. TravisSecond Circuit· 2001-02-02· cited 50×
- Hall v. MarshallE.D. New York· 2007-03-06· cited 12×
- Garson v. PerlmanE.D. New York· 2008-01-02· cited 11×
- United States v. RamirezSecond Circuit· 2017-01-25· cited 11×
- McKithen v. BrownE.D. New York· 2008-07-21· cited 4×
- Carver v. LehmanNinth Circuit· 2008-06-09· cited 4×
- Bailey v. PatakiS.D. New York· 2009-07-10· cited 2×
- Gordon v. AlexanderS.D. New York· 2009-01-05· cited 2×
- Gilmore v. GoordW.D. New York· 2006-02-15· cited 1×
- Siao-Pao v. MazzucaS.D. New York· 2006-08-02· cited 1×
- FOR THE SECOND CIRCUITSecond Circuit· 2012-08-03
- Carver v. LehmanNinth Circuit· 2008-12-22
- Davis v. DennisonSecond Circuit· 2007-03-02
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court· 1979-05-29· cited 3,299×
- California Department of Corrections v. MoralesSupreme Court· 1995-04-25· cited 1,142×
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court· 1925-11-23· cited 945×
- Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatSupreme Court· 1981-06-17· cited 728×
- Doe v. PatakiSecond Circuit· 1997-09-25· cited 96×
- Pugliese v. NelsonSecond Circuit· 1980-03-04· cited 94×
- Michael Boothe v. Edward Hammock, Chairman, New York State Board of ParoleSecond Circuit· 1979-09-14· cited 93×
- Lyman T. Shepard v. Larry Taylor, Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center, and Maurice Sigler, Chairman, United States Parole CommissionSecond Circuit· 1977-05-27· cited 89×
- Frank Berard v. State of Vermont Parole BoardSecond Circuit· 1984-03-06· cited 19×
- DiNapoli v. Northeast Regional Parole CommissionSecond Circuit· 1985-06-13· cited 11×
- Vincent Beltempo v. John T. Hadden, Warden and United States Parole CommissionSecond Circuit· 1987-04-07· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.