Doe v. Harris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Under the Due Process Clause, criminal defendants have a right to enforce the terms of their plea bargains.”
• “Under the Due Process Clause, criminal defendants have a right to enforce the terms of their plea bargains.”
• “We have allowed Doe to continue to proceed under a pseudonym because drawing public attention to his status as a sex offender is precisely the consequence that he seeks to avoid by bringing this suit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Doe v. Harris
  California Supreme Court· 2013-07-01· cited 187×
• The American Civil Liberties U v. Catherine Masto
  Ninth Circuit· 2012-02-10· cited 82×
• Michael Cuero v. Matthew Cate
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-06-30· cited 29×
• Candace Fox v. Deborah Johnson
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-08-08· cited 15×
• People v. France
  California Court of Appeal· 2020-12-15
• Allison Publications, LLC v. Jane Doe
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2022-08-18
• Loredo v. Gipson
  Ninth Circuit· 2016-03-21

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Santobello v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1971-12-20· cited 5,257×
• Smith v. Doe
  Supreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 1,492×
• United States v. Stoterau
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-04-29· cited 328×
• Angela K. Hagestad v. Roger C. Tragesser v. Oregon State Bar, Intervenor-Appellant
  Ninth Circuit· 1995-03-13· cited 299×
• Brian A. Buckley v. C.A. Terhune, Director of the California Department of Corrections
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-03-17· cited 99×
• Swenson v. File
  California Supreme Court· 1970-10-29· cited 75×
• People v. Gipson
  California Court of Appeal· 2004-04-20· cited 75×
• John Doe I, Jane Doe, and John Doe II v. Ronald O. Otte and Bruce M. Amended Botelho
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-08-08· cited 70×
• David Clinton Hatton v. Edward Bonner
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-01-27· cited 52×
• In Re Marriage of Walton
  California Court of Appeal· 1972-10-13· cited 47×
• People v. Arata
  California Court of Appeal· 2007-05-30· cited 36×
• People v. Acuna
  California Court of Appeal· 2000-01-27· cited 29×
• In Re Lowe
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-06-10· cited 19×