· 1/27/2004
David Clinton Hatton v. Edward Bonner
Citations
- 356 F.3d 955
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26772
- 2004 WL 117430
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the requirement that an individual register in person does not turn a registration law into an affirmative disability or restraint
- setting out a two-part analysis of an 27 ex post facto clause challenge to California’s sex-offender registration statute
- determining sex offender registration and notification scheme did not impose affirmative disability or restraint
- upholding California law containing several provisions different from the Alaska statute analyzed in Smith
- upholding California law containing several provisions different from the Alaska statute analyzed in Smith
- upholding California law containing several provisions different from the Alaska statute analyzed in Smith
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graber, Wardlaw, Bybee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.