Skip to main content
· 1/27/2004

David Clinton Hatton v. Edward Bonner

Citations

  • 356 F.3d 955
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 26772
  • 2004 WL 117430

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the requirement that an individual register in person does not turn a registration law into an affirmative disability or restraint
  • setting out a two-part analysis of an 27 ex post facto clause challenge to California’s sex-offender registration statute
  • determining sex offender registration and notification scheme did not impose affirmative disability or restraint
  • upholding California law containing several provisions different from the Alaska statute analyzed in Smith
  • upholding California law containing several provisions different from the Alaska statute analyzed in Smith
  • upholding California law containing several provisions different from the Alaska statute analyzed in Smith

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graber, Wardlaw, Bybee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.