Halen v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding driver “need not be informed verbatim”; rather, he need only be “substantially” informed of the information contained in that section
• “officer’s authority to require a defendant to submit to a blood withdrawal, under I.C. § 18-8002, does not turn on whether aggravating factors [such as those contained in I.C. § 18-8002(6)(b) ] are present.”
• “Motorists who refuse to submit to requested tests are entitled to have their licenses reinstated if they can establish at the refusal hearing that they were not completely advised . . . .”
• “Motorists who refuse to submit to requested tests are entitled to have their licenses reinstated if they can establish at the refusal hearing that they were not completely advised . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).