Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/13/2001
Doe v. Doe
Citations
- 551 S.E.2d 257
- 346 S.C. 145
- 2001 S.C. LEXIS 146
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating the burden of proof in a criminal proceeding is much higher than the burden of proof in a civil proceeding
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Toal, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cothran v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-01-27· cited 46×
- Carolina Renewal, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-10-08· cited 39×
- Zurcher v. BiltonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2008-08-11· cited 39×
- Carrigg v. CannonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2001-09-10· cited 26×
- Insight Technology, Inc. v. Williams (In re Williams)D. South Carolina· 2016-07-08· cited 1×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- South Carolina Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-04-01· cited 32×
- Herring v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1952-09-26· cited 30×
- Graham v. State Farm Fire & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-02-18· cited 28×
- Irby v. RichardsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-12-21· cited 16×
- Samuel v. MouzonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-09-10· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.