South Carolina Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the general preclusionary principles set forth in the Restatement (Second) of Judgments §§ 27, 28 and 29
• adopting the general rule set forth in the Restatement for offensive use of collateral estoppel
• \Nonmutual collateral estoppel may be asserted unless the party precluded lacked a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the first action . . . .\
• \Nonmutual collateral estoppel may be asserted unless the party precluded lacked a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the first action . . . .\
• \Nonmutual collateral estoppel may be asserted unless the party precluded lacked a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the first action . . . .\
• \Nonmutual collateral estoppel may be asserted unless the party precluded lacked a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in the first action or other circumstances justify affording him the opportunity to relitigate the issue.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).