Carrigg v. Cannon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that judicial estoppel did not apply based on lack of privity
• “The discretionary nature of judicial estoppel is such that it should not be applied if doing so would work “an injustice against the party being estopped while simultaneously subverting the judicial process.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).