Ninth Circuit· 7/21/2003
Dixon v. Wallowa County
Citations
- 336 F.3d 1013
- 2003 WL 21688614
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Issue preclusion does not apply to an issue that is not appealable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tashima, Trott, Wallace
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ewing v. City of StocktonNinth Circuit· 2009-12-09· cited 451×
- Zamani v. CarnesNinth Circuit· 2007-06-04· cited 387×
- Cox v. Maine State PoliceFirst Circuit· 2004-12-03· cited 212×
- Syncor Erisa Litigation v. Cardinal Health, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2008-02-19· cited 179×
- Maestas v. State of ColoradoTenth Circuit· 2003-11-26· cited 178×
- Robert Ybarra, Jr. v. Timothy FilsonNinth Circuit· 2017-09-01· cited 43×
- United States v. Song Ja ChaNinth Circuit· 2010-03-09· cited 32×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2006-03-16· cited 23×
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-05-23· cited 19×
- Osborne v. SeymourCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-11-09· cited 17×
- Resurgent Capital Services v. Burnett (In Re Burnett)Ninth Circuit· 2004-02-05· cited 14×
- City of Fresno v. United StatesE.D. California· 2010-06-30· cited 14×
- City Solutions Inc. v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2004-04-23· cited 9×
- Perry v. MendozaFifth Circuit· 2023-09-29· cited 8×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2005-06-13· cited 7×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2004-10-07· cited 6×
- Munafo v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthoritySecond Circuit· 2004-08-24· cited 6×
- A.D. v. MarkgrafNinth Circuit· 2011-04-06· cited 5×
- May v. ChertoffS.D. California· 2008-06-10· cited 5×
- Ministry of Defense & Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Cubic Defense Systems, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2004-10-07· cited 5×
Cites
30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 14,568×
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 8,858×
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 6,373×
- Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
- City of Los Angeles v. HellerSupreme Court· 1986-04-21· cited 2,104×
- Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 1,115×
- Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn.Supreme Court· 1988-04-19· cited 953×
- Harolyn Pavao, as Special Administratrix of the Estate of Jon Webster Pavao v. John Pagay County of HawaiiNinth Circuit· 2002-09-30· cited 265×
- Troy Swinton v. Potomac Corporation, Dba Crescent Cardboard Company, Dba crescent/u.s. MatNinth Circuit· 2001-10-24· cited 248×
- Price v. KramerNinth Circuit· 2000-01-11· cited 158×
- United States v. Carlos Arturo Ocampo, United States of America v. Jorge Arango, United States of America v. Jerald James DonatoNinth Circuit· 1991-07-01· cited 146×
- Fairley v. LumanNinth Circuit· 2002-02-15· cited 146×
- Jeffrey M. Janes v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Dba Sam's Club, and Gary DawesNinth Circuit· 2002-02-04· cited 144×
- Gabriel Ruvalcaba v. City of Los Angeles Daryl Gates, Martin Coon, ( 21604) in Both Their Personal and Official CapacitiesNinth Circuit· 1999-02-05· cited 109×
- Pension Trust Fund for Operating Engineers, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Federal Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantNinth Circuit· 2002-10-01· cited 109×
- No. 98-5136Third Circuit· 1998-12-30· cited 102×
- Robin Lynn Bailey v. Anthony Newland, WardenNinth Circuit· 2001-08-31· cited 96×
- Quintanilla v. City of DowneyNinth Circuit· 1996-05-22· cited 93×
- Mariann HOPKINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DOW CORNING CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1994-08-26· cited 88×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.