Jeffrey M. Janes v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Dba Sam's Club, and Gary Dawes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that \failing to make a motion for JMOL at the close of all the evidence may lull the opposing party into believing that the moving party has abandoned any challenge....\
• noting that “substantial compliance [with Rule 50] is not 12 enough”
• rejecting the defendant’s argument that its trial brief satisfied the requirements of Rule 50 because “substantial compliance is not enough.”
• this court will not consider matters raised for the first time on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).