Dixon v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding single valid aggravator alone is enough to enhance a sentence or to impose it consecutive to another and that the same factor may be used both to enhance a presumptive sentence and to justify consecutive sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Allan Johnson
  Seventh Circuit· 2005-10-14· cited 122×
• William R. Dixon v. Indiana Department of Correction
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-06-16· cited 2×
• Shafer v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2006-11-14· cited 1×
• Buck Gleason v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2012-03-29
• Stephen D. Booker v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2015-12-23

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lee v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2004-10-19· cited 123×
• Fointno v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1986-01-06· cited 98×
• Beatty v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1991-03-13· cited 35×
• Schafer v. Sellersburg Town Council
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1999-06-29· cited 33×
• Martin v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-03-12· cited 29×
• Indiana State Teachers Ass'n v. Board of School Commissioners of Indianapolis
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-04-21· cited 28×
• Thompson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-05-23· cited 20×
• Jones v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-09-12· cited 8×
• Anderson v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2003-11-19· cited 6×